WHO WINS AFCN FUNDING V2 · 2021–2026 Română
357 scores · 2,413 funded projects on the map

A tenth of a point can decide who gets funded.

At AFCN, just 0.17 points can separate the last funded application from the first one left without funding. We placed those tight rankings beside six years of results to see where the line falls — and which advantages reappear above it.

The score analysis uses five lists published in July 2026. The map follows 2,413 funded projects in the same 11 areas from 2021 through 2026.

Where the line falls
Choose an area and an information layer. Each dot is one application.
FundedUnfunded
95.83
Delta Collective. Stories about food and infrastructures
Asociatia Young Actions and Abstractions
Funded
357
applications with a score
81
funded applications
16,05
million lei awarded
23
applications within one point below the cutoff

English titles appear more often among the winners. We still do not know why.

Across these five lists, applications with English in the title were funded more often. The gap remains when applications from the same funding area are compared, but the data cannot show whether the title influenced evaluators. Title language may travel with experience, networks or the quality of the application.

Source: five AFCN lists, 357 scored applications.

How many applications were funded, by title language

Clearly English
32.4%
Mixed RO-EN
21.7%
Undetermined / another language
38.5%
Clearly Romanian
18.0%

Clearly English titles: 22 of 68 funded. Clearly Romanian titles: 39 of 217.

The scores are very close

Clearly English
89.00
Mixed RO-EN
88.17
Undetermined / another language
89.41
Clearly Romanian
87.83

Each bar counts applications within a five-point score band. The red line marks the middle score in each category. Every category uses the same 60-100 scale.

How much confidence can we place in this signal?

All three calculations lean in the same direction, but the size of the advantage is not yet stable.

In the first two calculations, the range reaches “no difference”. The data are also compatible with a very small advantage. The strictest comparison shows a clearer advantage, but depends more heavily on how titles are classified.

Any English, compared with the restsignal still unclear
+7.9 points
The same comparison, within the same funding areasignal still unclear
+9.6 points
Clearly English titles, compared with clearly Romanian titlesclearer difference
+14.3 points

How to read this: the blue dot is the central estimate. The black line shows the range of plausible results. When the line crosses the “no difference” marker, the data also allow a scenario in which the advantage is very small or absent.

The budget cuts the ranking at decimal points.

Within every area, all funded applications rank above all unfunded ones. The tension comes from the density of the ranking: the last funded place and the first application left without money are separated by 0.17 to 0.50 points.

Cutoff = the lowest funded score in each area.

ASM
89.67
Music
gap: 0.17
7 within one point
award: RON 3,000,000
AV
91.33
Visual arts
gap: 0.33
5 within one point
award: RON 5,000,000
PCM
91.33
Tangible cultural heritage
gap: 0.50
4 within one point
award: RON 3,000,000
PR
94.67
Recurring projects
gap: 0.17
5 within one point
award: RON 4,499,997
RPC
89.33
Magazines
gap: 0.50
2 within one point
award: RON 550,000

Applicant experience leaves a stronger trace.

Legal names that appear twice in the five lists have a 33.9% funding rate. Applicants appearing once have a 20.6% rate. Name matching cannot recognise different organisations run by the same team, so the true level of repetition may be higher.

The same legal name

33,9%
appears twice
19 of 56 funded
20,6%
appears once
62 of 301 funded
Within the same funding area, repeat applicants have nearly twice the odds of funding. The estimate is 1.91; the plausible range is 1.01–3.60.

Applicant type, read from the published name

Public / educational institution
39.1%
Other / unclear
28.2%
Association / foundation
21.4%
Company / sole trader
18.0%

The category is inferred from the name rather than legally verified application by application. There are only 23 public institutions, so a handful of cases can move their rate substantially.

Six years. The centre of gravity barely moves.

The series now reaches back to 2021. In each of the six years, Bucharest–Ilfov accounts for 50% to 56% of projects with identified headquarters. Together, Bucharest–Ilfov, Transylvania and Banat account for 81% to 89%.

2,413 funded projects · 11 comparable areas · 2,008 projects with identified headquarters.

2,413
funded projects in the comparable series
2,008
83.2% with identified headquarters
53.1%
of located projects are headquartered in Bucharest–Ilfov
84.7%
are in Bucharest–Ilfov, Transylvania and Banat

How each year is divided

Bars use projects with identified headquarters only. The badge shows how each row was assembled.

2021reconstructed316/349
B–I 54.1% · 3 areas 84.2%
2022reconstructed319/351
B–I 55.8% · 3 areas 82.1%
2023reconstructed294/321
B–I 56.5% · 3 areas 81.3%
2024published429/596
B–I 51.0% · 3 areas 84.4%
2025published328/422
B–I 50.3% · 3 areas 87.2%
2026published322/374
B–I 52.2% · 3 areas 88.8%
Bucharest–IlfovTransylvaniaBanatMoldaviaOther regions

How much the centre of gravity actually moves

Choose one series or keep the overview.

0%25%50%75%100%202120222023202420252026reconstructedpublished2021: 84.2%2022: 82.1%2023: 81.3%2024: 84.4%2025: 87.2%2026: 88.8%Three areas2021: 54.1%2022: 55.8%2023: 56.5%2024: 51.0%2025: 50.3%2026: 52.2%Bucharest–Ilfov2021: 6.6%2022: 7.5%2023: 8.5%2024: 6.8%2025: 4.9%2026: 5.9%Moldavia

Bucharest–Ilfov stays in a narrow 50.3%–56.5% band. The three areas range from 81.3%–88.8%, while Moldavia ranges from 4.9%–8.5%.

Project counts and money tell nearly the same story

Award amounts are available for 2021–2023. We compare project shares with funding shares among located cases only.

projectsawards
Bucharest–Ilfov
55.4%
55.9%
Transylvania
21.1%
21.0%
Banat
6.0%
6.0%
Moldavia
7.5%
7.6%
Other regions
9.9%
9.5%
Across 2021–2023, Bucharest–Ilfov accounts for 55.4% of located projects and 55.9% of located award value. The gap between the two maps is only 0.5 percentage points.

How much of each year is visible

Coverage differs because the two series were documented at different times and with different resources. Projects without a reliable headquarters are not pushed into a region simply to complete the chart.

2021reconstructed90.5%
316 identified · 33 without headquarters
2022reconstructed90.9%
319 identified · 32 without headquarters
2023reconstructed91.6%
294 identified · 27 without headquarters
2024published72.0%
429 identified · 167 without headquarters
2025published77.7%
328 identified · 94 without headquarters
2026published86.1%
322 identified · 52 without headquarters
documented reconstructionpublished series
Headquarters are not project locations.

The map shows where the organisation contracting the grant is based. A Bucharest beneficiary may work in Botoșani, while a Cluj organisation may operate nationwide. For 2021–2023, every attribution retains its source; for 2024–2026, we use George Pleșu’s published series. Session II/2026 remains provisional.

All 357 scores from 2026 remain open for inspection.

Search a title or applicant, narrow the funding area and compare funded applications with those left below the line. This is the registry behind the five July 2026 lists analysed here.

Applications rejected on administrative grounds, which received no score, do not appear here.

357 applications
ScoreProject and applicantAreaLanguageDecisionAward
98.83
Asociatia REVIVART
ASMClearly RomanianFundedRON 249,714
98.67
Universitatea „Lucian Blaga” din Sibiu
RPCUndetermined / another languageFundedRON 45,000
98.50
Asociatia "Uniunea de Creatie Interpretativa a Muzicienilor din Romania"
ASMClearly EnglishFundedRON 247,400
98.00
IGLOO MEDIA
RPCClearly EnglishFundedRON 45,000
97.50
ASOCIATIA CULTURALA MANEKINO
PRClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
97.50
ASOCIATIA FAPTE
PRMixed RO-ENFundedRON 250,000
97.33
Academia Națională de Muzică ”Gheorghe Dima” din Cluj-Napoca
PRClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
96.33
Asociația Music Hub
PRClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
96.33
Asociatia Culturala Metropolis
PRClearly RomanianFundedRON 249,997
96.17
Citizenit
PCMClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
96.17
SG STUDIO SRL
RPCClearly RomanianFundedRON 45,000
95.83
Asociatia Make Better
PCMClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
95.83
Asociația Animest
PRClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
95.83
Asociatia Young Actions and Abstractions
AVClearly EnglishFundedRON 250,000
95.83
Asociatia de dezvoltare a filmului romanesc
RPCClearly EnglishFundedRON 42,995
95.67
COMUNITATEA156
PRMixed RO-ENFundedRON 231,970
95.67
Asociația ,,ANTIQVA''
ASMUndetermined / another languageFundedRON 249,923
95.50
Centrul Român OISTAT (Organizația Internațională a Scenografilor, Tehnicienilor și Arhitecților de Teatru)
PRMixed RO-ENFundedRON 250,000
95.33
Centrul Român OISTAT (Organizația Internațională a Scenografilor, Tehnicienilor și Arhitecților de Teatru)
PRClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
95.33
IVY DESIGN CONSULT SRL
AVUndetermined / another languageFundedRON 249,656
95.33
SAVE OR CANCEL production SRL
RPCClearly RomanianFundedRON 45,000
95.17
Asociația Culturală PLAY
PRClearly EnglishFundedRON 250,000
95.17
Asociatia META Spatiu
PRClearly EnglishFundedRON 250,000
95.00
DC COMMUNICATION
PCMClearly RomanianFundedRON 247,873
95.00
CASA DE CULTURĂ KONYA ADAM
PRMixed RO-ENFundedRON 134,100
95.00
Art Conservation Support
RPCClearly RomanianFundedRON 19,700
94.83
ESUA-Asociație Culturală Româno-Germană
PRClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
94.83
ASOCIAȚIA DELAZERO
PRClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
94.83
OVERGROUND MUSIC S.R.L.
ASMMixed RO-ENFundedRON 241,863
94.83
Muzeul National al Taranului Roman
RPCMixed RO-ENFundedRON 45,000
94.67
Asociația Culturală PLAY
PRClearly RomanianFundedRON 226,786
94.67
Asociatia Tinerilor Cineasti
PRClearly EnglishFundedRON 226,786
94.67
Asociatia Ideo Ideis
PRClearly RomanianFundedRON 226,786
94.67
ASOCIAȚIA BUCHARTEST
PRMixed RO-ENFundedRON 226,786
94.67
Asociația Tangent
PRClearly EnglishFundedRON 226,786
94.67
ASOCIAȚIA ROMÂNĂ PENTRU PROMOVAREA ARTELOR SPECTACOLULUI
RPCClearly RomanianFundedRON 45,000
94.50
Asociatia Protha Panciu
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
94.50
Asociația REC (RESURSE PENTRU EDUCATIE ȘI CULTURĂ)
AVMixed RO-ENFundedRON 190,161
94.50
INOMUSICART
ASMClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
94.33
Asociația Amural
PRMixed RO-ENUnfunded-
94.33
Asociația Forumul Artelor Vizuale
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
94.33
ASOCIATIA IGLOO HABITAT SI ARHITECTURA
RPCClearly RomanianFundedRON 45,000
94.17
Asociatia Mioritics
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
94.17
Filarmonica de Stat „Transilvania” Cluj-Napoca
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
94.17
Asociatia Culturala Marginal
AVClearly EnglishFundedRON 249,998
94.00
Centrul de Ecologie Montana
PCMClearly RomanianFundedRON 203,707
94.00
GHEORGHE ADRIANA-GABRIELA PERSOANĂ FIZICĂ AUTORIZATĂ
AVClearly RomanianFundedRON 210,010
94.00
Asociatia culturala Solitude Project
AVClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
93.67
Asociația Da'DeCe
PCMClearly RomanianFundedRON 249,993
93.67
Fundatia DALA
AVMixed RO-ENFundedRON 249,350
93.67
CASA DE CULTURĂ
ASMUndetermined / another languageFundedRON 207,000
93.50
Asociatia Culturala Cetatea Alba - Filiala Cluj
PRClearly EnglishUnfunded-
93.50
Asociația Salonul de proiecte
AVClearly RomanianFundedRON 249,972
93.33
Fundația Astra Film
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
93.33
FUNDATIA CANTACUZINO FLORESTI
PRMixed RO-ENUnfunded-
93.33
Asociația Graphic Front
PRMixed RO-ENUnfunded-
93.33
Asociația ,,ANTIQVA''
ASMUndetermined / another languageFundedRON 246,625
93.17
Muzeul Casa Mureșenilor Brașov
PCMClearly RomanianFundedRON 219,451
93.17
ASOCIAȚIA LOCAL DESIGN CIRCLE
PRClearly EnglishUnfunded-
93.17
Asocatia Simultan
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
93.17
Asociația Elite Art Club UNESCO
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
93.17
Asociația HEARTH
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
93.17
ASOCIATIA UNDERGROUND FESTIVAL
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
93.00
Varga M Paula Viorela PFA
PCMClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
93.00
ALT REAL
PRUndetermined / another languageUnfunded-
93.00
TEATRUL ANDREI MURESANU
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
93.00
Asociația OM Centru Coregrafic
PRMixed RO-ENUnfunded-
93.00
Asociatia de Prietenie Korunk
RPCClearly RomanianFundedRON 28,000
92.83
ASOCIATIA CULTURALA NEOART ROMANIA
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
92.83
Asociatia Living Content
AVClearly EnglishFundedRON 141,266
92.83
Fundația Art Encounters Foundation
AVClearly EnglishFundedRON 250,000
92.67
Asociația Prietenii Mocăniței
PCMClearly RomanianFundedRON 229,365
92.67
Asociatia The Story of Autism
PRClearly RomanianUnfunded-
92.67
Asociatia C4Company
PRMixed RO-ENUnfunded-
92.67
GALERIA CATINCA TABACARU S.R.L.
AVClearly RomanianFundedRON 250,000
92.50
ONE NIGHT GALLERY SRL
AVClearly EnglishFundedRON 249,480
92.33
Asociatia Forums
PCMClearly RomanianFundedRON 232,960
92.33
Asociatia Tehnoarte
AVClearly EnglishFundedRON 180,000
92.33
Atelierele Scanteia
AVClearly EnglishFundedRON 235,050
92.33
Galeria Ivan srl
AVClearly RomanianFundedRON 249,867

1,021 projects, one by one.

These are the funded projects in the 11 comparable areas for 2021–2023. You can inspect the beneficiary, score, award, identified headquarters and the source used for each location.

929 located projects · 92 projects kept off the map rather than placed by assumption.

1,021
funded projects
84.6m lei
awarded in 2021–2023
929
91.0% located
92
left unidentified

What the numbers show — and what they cannot settle alone.

The lists show scores, cutoffs and awards. They do not show why each evaluator decided as they did, which organisations share a team, or where every activity took place.

Two datasets, two questions

The 357 applications evaluated in 2026 show how the ranking forms. The 2,413 funded projects from 2021–2026 show where beneficiaries are headquartered. The two comparisons answer different questions and remain separate.

How 2021–2023 were reconstructed

We extracted beneficiaries from 66 final AFCN lists, covering two sessions a year in the same 11 areas. Names were checked against the corresponding yearly editions of the National NGO Registry and, where the registry was not enough, against other public sources. Only locations clearly supported by evidence enter the percentages.

Title language

Titles were grouped as clearly English, mixed Romanian–English, clearly Romanian, or undetermined/another language. The result is an association, not proof that title language influenced evaluators.

How to read the map

Shares use projects with identified headquarters only. Bucharest–Ilfov, Transylvania and Banat are shown separately, as is Moldavia. Crișana–Maramureș, Dobrogea, Oltenia and Muntenia outside Ilfov are grouped as “Other regions” to keep the same convention across all years.

Why 92 projects remain off the map

Companies and sole traders with changed, highly similar or poorly documented names are the hardest cases. They remain in the totals, but are not placed on the map simply to fill the gaps.

Administrative headquarters or project location?

The analysis uses the beneficiary’s headquarters. This captures where the capacity to write, contract and administer projects is concentrated; it does not directly measure where cultural activity reaches audiences.

What would make the conclusions stronger

Individual evaluator scores, tax identifiers published in the result lists, affiliations between entities and a record of implementation locations would allow firmer conclusions.

Lists analysed in 2026
AFCN: Arte vizuale, sesiunea II/2026Applications evaluated and funded after stage one.
AFCN: Proiecte cu caracter repetitiv, II/2026Applications evaluated and funded after stage one.
AFCN: Patrimoniu cultural material, II/2026Applications evaluated and funded after stage one.
AFCN: Artele spectacolului — muzică, II/2026Applications evaluated and funded after stage one.
AFCN: Reviste și publicații culturale, 2026Applications evaluated and funded after stage one.
Map and historical reconstruction
George Pleșu, „Cine câștigă la AFCN”, 11 iulie 2026Geographic data and an explanation of how headquarters were assigned.
AFCN: arhiva rezultatelor 2022–2024Final lists used to extract funded projects for 2022 and 2023.
AFCN: arhiva istorică a rezultatelorFinal lists used for 2021 and to cross-check historical documents.
Ministerul Justiției: Registrul Național ONGThe 2021, 2022 and 2023 editions used for associations, foundations, federations and unions.
AFCN: Raport de activitate 2023Total check: 374 cultural-project contracts and 60 publication contracts.